Vector 750 Watt Power Inverter User Manual Page 4

  • Download
  • Add to my manuals
  • Print
  • Page
    / 25
  • Table of contents
  • BOOKMARKS
  • Rated. / 5. Based on customer reviews
Page view 3
into each other horizontally, they were now pushed
linearly into each other vertically. This allowed much
more graphite rod length to be consumed in a typical run
(1/2 inch total graphite rod consumption for the rotary
approach, versus over 3 inches for the linear approach).
Air leakage during the synthesis was now minimal, as
the starting and final pressures were the same, and the
mass lost by the consumption of the graphite rods
balanced with the total mass of the end products.
However, new problems arose with the longer
duration of a run. Heating and pressure rise required the
process to be broken into short arc synthesis runs
followed by a cool-down of several minutes, after which
the arc synthesis would resume. While the yields rose to
about 3.5 %, the frequent rapid thermal cycling resulted
in the failure of a bell jar, as shown in Figure 1.
Another problem resulted from both graphite rods
being supported by cantilevered copper clamps. The
linear feedthrough also permitted rotary motion, so both
clamps had to be aligned along a common axis before
they could be pushed into each other. This was easy at
the start of a run, when the bell jar was clean and visual
alignment was possible. But as the interior of the bell jar
became coated with soot, is would be easy to misalign
the two rods so that they missed each other and
contacted the other rods’ copper clamp. This resulted in
a lot of melted copper.
The use of a linear motion feedthrough significantly
improved yields. This also generated much more soot so
that the total production mass of fullerene per run
increased dramatically. However, the increased mainte-
nance in frequently making new copper clamps, and loss
of a bell jar, made it a mixed blessing. Reducing the
duration of the arc synthesis segment and allowing more
cooling time between segments together reduced
thermal stress cycles and the magnitude of the pressure
swings. This also improved yield, and started to suggest
an optimum pressure range of around 150 Torr
III. MORE IMPROVEMENTS
Elimination of the cantilevered copper clamp on the
linear feedthrough became an obvious improvement.
This graphite rod was now mounted coaxial with the
linear feedthrough rod, so only linear motion was
needed. Sometimes, if the two graphite rods were
pushed into each other too forcefully, they would spot
weld. A slight rotation of the linear feedthrough would
easily break this weld, and the procedure could
continue. The mounting of the lower graphite rod is
shown in the center of Figure 2. To the left is an electri-
cally insulated copper feedthrough (¼ inch diameter)
used to mount the upper graphite electrode.
A collar is placed on the linear feedthrough shaft
outside the bell jar. It is locked in place to act as a stop
so that when most of the graphite rods are consumed by
the arc, you cannot accidentally go too far and touch the
copper clamps together, again, producing a lot of melted
copper.
A cooling coil was then added to remove excess
heat and stabilize the pressure swings. This consisted of
a section of copper tubing with 3” id and 4” long,
outside of which was wound with four turns of ¼ inch
copper tubing, soldered in place. Swagelock bulkhead
connectors were used to connect the cooling coil to the
baseplate.
Normally, tap water was used as a coolant, flowing
at approximately ½ gallon per minute. Maximum
pressure variations were now of the order of only a few
Torr. In one experiment, liquid nitrogen was used as a
coolant. Curiously, it had no impact on yield. Perhaps
the temperature differential from arc plasma tempera-
tures (a few thousand Kelvins) to a water cooled surface
(at about 285 K) versus to a LN
2
cooled surface (77 K)
is not too different. Figure 3 shows the upper graphite
electrode and its holder in place, as well as the cooling
coil.
A refrigeration service vacuum pump, with a base
pressure of 25 milliTorr, did not significantly increase
yields when used for the pumpdown-backfill prepara-
tion sequence, but using 5N9 helium (99.999%) did
show a slight improvement in yield. A prepped system
ready to initiate the arc is shown in Figure 4, with the
safety shield removed.
At the end of a run, the system was allowed to cool
to room temperature, and then vented to atmospheric
pressure. When removing the bell jar, a vent hose was
used to collect any soot that may have been dislodged.
Soot can be seen covering just about everything in
Figure 5. The silvery material around the ends of the
rods is sometimes called “popcorn” and is rich in
carbon
the Bell Jar, Vol. 10, No. 3/4, Summer/Fall 2001
2
Figure 1 - Fractured Bell Jar
Page view 3
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 24 25

Comments to this Manuals

No comments